#Democracy 3 complacency full#

For example, the UK 2016-2020 as a whole ended up worse off at the end of BREXIT, but the 4 year break up is portrayed by hard core supporters as a country win or the USA 2016-2020 as a whole ended up worse off after 4 years of “Make America Great Again”, but policies benefiting the minority view/rich only are presented by hard core supporters as country wins.

For this reason as long as the exism movement persist or gains ground, even if the country/democracy as a whole loses as the result of implementing the movement policies, it is seen as a country win, be it social or economic losses. As the legal and political loyalty in extreme democratic outcomes is to the party/individual/movement, in the case of the USA, loyalty is to Trumpism and the case of the UK, loyalty is to Brexism, then they go in direct conflict with normal democratic values such as independent rule of law and loyalty to country/democracy. The coming of Brexit and Trumpism has been seen since 2016 by normal liberal democracy oriented politicians as unfortunate outcomes in the UK and in the USA without apparently realising that these extreme democratic outcomes are in essence the seeds of antidemocratic or autocratic based forces that aimed in order to survive at undermining or dismantling the normal democratic model and value system inside which through effective targeted chaos they comes to exist. Extreme liberal democracy thinking can be linked to political and legal loyalty to party/individual/movement as they are fundamental for extreme democratic outcome to persist when conflict arises in the democratic process between loyalty to party and loyalty to country.

#Democracy 3 complacency full#

It can be said that extreme liberal democracies based on minority view rule or based on populism with a mask lead to extreme democratic outcomes(EDO) under effective targeted chaos or under full true majority complacency, in one person one vote and everybody vote based systems.

Normal liberal democracy thinking can be linked to political and legal loyalty to country/democracy/ constitution as they are fundamental for normal democratic outcomes to persist when conflict arises in the democratic process between loyalty to country and loyalty to party. It can be said that normal liberal democracies based on majority view rule or based on normal populism lead to normal democratic outcomes(NDO) under no complacency, one person one vote and everybody vote based systems. It has been highlighted in the past few years that under true majority complacency (Muñoz 2017a) democratic outcomes can be flipped outside down (Muñoz 2017b) bringing them away from traditional liberal democracy thinking and expectations (Muñoz 2015), a process consistent with specific complacency expectations rules (Muñoz 2018) that can be manipulated through targeted chaos (Muñoz 2019a) to produce extreme democratic outcomes like Trumpism, which needs to go immediately after coming to exist into war with normal liberal democracy values and institutions (Muñoz 2019b). The coming of Brexism (BBC 2016) and Trumpism (Rawlinson 2016 TG 2016) has been seen since 2016 by normal liberal democracy oriented politicians simply as unexpected outcomes without apparently realising that these extreme democratic outcomes are in essence the seeds of antidemocratic or autocratic based forces, which are aimed at undermining or dismantling the normal democratic norms and value system inside which they come to exist and this is done in order to maintain effective targeted chaos ongoing ) so as to win elections or done to facilitate their persistence at all cost in case of re-election loss through filing non-factual claims of electoral fraud in lower courts (Shamsian and Sheth 2021) and the supreme court(CBC 2020a) or demanding political loyalty (Solender 2020 Yourish et al 2021) or through force if needed (Wamsley 2021) as the case of Trumpism has shown.